Australia Introduces New Bill to Ban Social Media for Kids Under 16

The Australian Parliament has enacted groundbreaking legislation prohibiting children under the age of 16 from using social media. Passed with overwhelming support in the House of Representatives—102 votes in favor and 13 against—the new bill imposes strict regulations on social media platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, and X.

Stringent Penalties for Non-Compliance

Under the legislation, social media companies will face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars if they fail to enforce the age restriction. Platforms are granted a year to implement the required age-verification measures before penalties come into effect.

Strengthened Privacy Protections

Opposition lawmaker Dan Tehan highlighted amendments aimed at safeguarding user privacy. These changes will prohibit platforms from requiring government-issued identification, such as passports or driver’s licenses, to verify user age. Additionally, the legislation prevents companies from mandating digital identification through government systems, ensuring that privacy concerns are addressed.

Perspectives from Parliament

Tehan acknowledged the legislation’s imperfections, stating, “Will it be perfect? No. But if it helps, even in the smallest way, it can make a significant difference in people’s lives.” Communications Minister Michelle Rowland indicated that the Senate would debate the bill later in the day, with major party backing ensuring its likely passage.

Criticism from Independent Lawmakers

Independent lawmakers were among the most vocal critics, arguing that the legislation was rushed and lacked thorough scrutiny. Concerns included potential ineffectiveness, privacy risks for users of all ages, and the erosion of parental authority in deciding what is best for their children.

Critics also warned of unintended consequences, such as isolating children, denying them access to the positive aspects of social media, and possibly driving them toward the dark web. Furthermore, they cautioned that the ban might discourage young users from reporting online abuse and remove incentives for platforms to develop safer environments.

Zoe Daniel’s Concerns on the Legislation

Independent lawmaker Zoe Daniel criticized the legislation for failing to address the inherent harms of social media. “The true purpose of this legislation isn’t to make social media safe by design but to create the illusion for parents and voters that the government is taking action,” she said during parliamentary debates.

Daniel further argued that the legislation's so-called “world-leading” nature stems from the fact that no other country has adopted similar measures, a reflection of its questionable practicality.

Requests for Delay and Evaluation

Social media platforms have requested that the legislation's vote be postponed until June next year. This delay would allow for the release of a government-commissioned evaluation on age-assurance technologies, offering insights into the feasibility and enforcement of the ban. Despite these requests, the government proceeded with the legislation, citing its urgency in addressing the risks associated with social media use by children.

Conclusion: A Divisive but Groundbreaking Legislation

Australia social media ban for children under 16 has sparked a wide-ranging debate. While proponents see it as a necessary step to protect children online, critics argue that it risks undermining user privacy, parental authority, and the benefits of social media. As the Senate prepares to finalize the legislation, its implementation and effectiveness remain to be seen, setting a significant precedent for digital governance worldwide.